MSI MEG X299 CREATION (MS-7C06)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C06
MotherboardMSI MEG X299 CREATION (MS-7C06)  (all builds)
Memory35.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181026
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 03 '20 at 05:27
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9820X-$550
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 74.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 253
82% 151 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 891
81% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,614
100% 1,614 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Gigabyte(1458 37B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 155
Parallax 159
136% 160 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 143
Splatting 107
114% 144 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 162 161 159 162 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 456
Mixed 357
SusWrite 193
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 52.3
184% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
327GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 459 471 465 438 284 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 452
Mixed 425
SusWrite 429
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 53.3
187% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 357
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 119%
Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
244GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 113 113 111 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 156
Write 129
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 112
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 108%
Corsair Voyager SliderX1 253GB
220GB free, PID 1a15
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 94 96 95 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44% Average
Read 132
Write 64.5
Mixed 19
SusWrite 94
93% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 44%
Great: 45%
Corsair Voyager SliderX1 253GB
236GB free, PID 1a15
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 96 86 94 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 134
Write 55.3
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 93.4
93% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
126% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x16GB
3 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 10
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X299 CREATION (MS-7C06) Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 167%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X299 CREATION (MS-7C06)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,633
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback