User System

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ECT
Motherboard	MSI Z170-A PRO (MS-7971)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160511
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '20 at 16:07
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 91.9 1-Core 127 2-Core 255 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 702 72% 582 Pts	64-Core 701 43% 701 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 22F7) CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.7.1 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.5% Below average	Lighting 42 Reflection 57.3 Parallax 58.3 34% 52.5 fps	MRender 57.9 Gravity 43.4 Splatting 49.2 41% 50.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 231GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 389 345 345 348 342 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	123% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 485 Mixed 399 SusWrite 373 99% 439 MB/s	4K Read 44.8 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 59.9 206% 73.2 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 180 185% 302 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 134%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38 83,298 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 132GB free Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.4 257 276 7.3 7.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 496 Write 460 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 93.7 58% 265 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 0.5 26% 7.03 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 92%
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63 12,393 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 88GB free Firmware: CS131122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 93 92 92 93 93 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 476 Mixed 381 SusWrite 118 83% 371 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 40.1 157% 59.1 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 111 146% 261 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 697GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 192 190 189 193 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 134 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 190 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-065.A00G 1x16GB 818 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	41.7% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 11.8 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 13.6 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)