| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120529 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 02 '20 at 05:42 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 63% |
PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
59.1%
Above average
|
62% 104 Pts
|
28% 214 Pts
|
15% 243 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
107%
Outstanding
|
109% 160 fps
|
109% 134 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 161 114 106 103 105 MB/s
|
39.5%
Below average
|
39% 175 MB/s
|
72% 23.3 MB/s
|
28% 39 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
378GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 61 53 50 57 50 MB/s
|
19.3%
Very poor
|
25% 34 MB/s
|
45% 0.27 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 126 127 126 127 127 MB/s
|
63.4%
Good
|
68% 93.6 MB/s
|
179% 1.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
44.6%
Average
|
44% 15.5 GB/s
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
53% 75.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 579 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 103x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 85x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 44x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 56x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 33x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 26x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $335 |