MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7917
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime58.2 Days
Run DateSep 01 '20 at 18:14
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 201
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 527
52% 428 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
EVGA(3842 2081) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 151
Parallax 162
121% 154 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 137
Splatting 104
107% 135 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
201GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 362 354 371 361 390 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 354
Write 236
Mixed 291
SusWrite 364
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 30.7
108% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 247
205% 295 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84%
Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
238GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 364 388 373 397 393 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 383
Mixed 328
SusWrite 377
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 35.9
122% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 340
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,914
Write 1,722
Mixed 1,290
365% 1,642 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 55.5
200% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 605
DQ Mixed 619
474% 643 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
699GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 77.2
Mixed 65
62% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.3 9.5 4.8 8.8 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 160
Write 6.2
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 7.2
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 100%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
449GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 127 126 128 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 113
Write 122
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 127
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
201% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) Builds (Compare 6,771 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback