Gigabyte GA-B360 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B360 AORUS GAMING 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B360 AORUS GAMING 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200120
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '20 at 10:13
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 95 2-Core 172 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 806 71% 603 Pts	64-Core 1,259 78% 1,259 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0521) CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.1 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.7% Average	Lighting 50.7 Reflection 58.8 Parallax 69.9 41% 59.8 fps	MRender 64.4 Gravity 62 Splatting 53.3 48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WDC WDS100T2G0A-00JH30 1TB 17,953 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 435GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 57 122 43 9.5 44 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 383 Write 108 Mixed 109 SusWrite 46.2 35% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 2.5 3% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 865GB free Firmware: 0710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 92 92 93 95 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 84.5 Write 124 Mixed 92 SusWrite 91.4 73% 98 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB 212 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	62.5% Good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 20.2 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 17.4 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B360 AORUS GAMING 3-CF Builds (Compare 584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 74%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	139x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	122x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	96x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	51x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	27x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	22x
CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 23,313 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $651

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16