Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 146% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 126% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 01 '20 at 10:10
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Memory 84.6 1-Core 121 2-Core 266 86% 157 Pts	4-Core 522 8-Core 763 80% 642 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2487) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	159% Outstanding	Lighting 220 Reflection 227 Parallax 225 180% 224 fps	MRender 270 Gravity 217 Splatting 138 163% 209 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 731GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1251 1227 1226 1121 1122 1117 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	272% Outstanding	Read 1,227 Write 1,098 Mixed 1,102 SusWrite 1,177 259% 1,151 MB/s	4K Read 61.6 4K Write 176 4K Mixed 89.7 301% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,378 DQ Write 1,205 DQ Mixed 1,313 978% 1,299 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 272% Great: 372%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 107GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 477 477 452 452 395 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 459 Write 460 Mixed 351 SusWrite 454 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 98.2 4K Mixed 48.8 163% 59.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 198 191% 303 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$408 6,794 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 41.3 MC Write 43.3 MC Mixed 39 118% 41.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 21.2 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	762x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	194x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	114x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16