Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom 230 273 User benchmarks, average bench 19% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	21.2% Poor	Memory 41.2 1-Core 5.8 2-Core 7.9 16% 18.3 Pts	4-Core 9.3 8-Core 9.6 1% 9.45 Pts	64-Core 11.5 1% 11.5 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25 14,710 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AC01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 46 40 62 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 83.8 Write 12.7 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 54.5 33% 44.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 62%
Kimtigo 8GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7.6 7.7 6.6 7.5 7.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	3.32% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 3.7 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 7.2 8% 6.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 6% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.32% Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 3GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	1% Terrible	Read 0.8 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.5 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 15% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.94% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.47 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.8 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.94% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16