Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca) 28,018 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Memory 58.5 1-Core 36.3 2-Core 65.2 35% 53.3 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 109 15% 111 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 82F6) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 1.87 Reflection 3.92 Parallax 2.62 2% 2.8 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 3.13 2% 2.55 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GB 2,836 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2311006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 278 288 283 283 289 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 434 Write 275 Mixed 206 SusWrite 276 66% 298 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 11.7 69% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 71.3 76% 126 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM1L16BC8R2-B1XS 1x8GB 2,239 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 6.8 19% 6.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 4,472 samples	40x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	26x
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	6x

SSD
MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 91%, 5,596 samples	7x
SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 2,836 samples	3x
MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 46%, 3,641 samples	2x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 1x4GBMicronBench 19%, 3,980 samples	11x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	8x
AM1L16BC8R2-B1XS 1x8GBAdataBench 22%, 2,239 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16