To ConRoeXFire-eSATA2.

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	To ConRoeXFire-eSATA2. (all builds)
Memory	1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070416
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '20 at 19:39
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6420-$190 2,091 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 54.6 1-Core 20.8 2-Core 24.1 26% 33.2 Pts	4-Core 17 8-Core 30.6 3% 23.8 Pts	64-Core 38.9 2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 84F2) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.32% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 3.65 Parallax 3.78 3% 3.79 fps	MRender 4.29 Gravity 3.23 Splatting 5.13 4% 4.22 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.32% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 49 43 50 50 53 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.3% Below average	Read 228 Write 158 Mixed 205 SusWrite 47.5 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 18.4 78% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 30.6 DQ Write 93.7 DQ Mixed 25.4 30% 49.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 86%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 32GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 59 52 47 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 64.2 Write 29.2 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 54.9 35% 46.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 40GB free Firmware: CC3E SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 52 51 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 88.2 Write 58.8 Mixed 54.6 SusWrite 50.7 47% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 68%
Samsung HD160HJ 160GB 1,643 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 20GB free Firmware: BF100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 59 51 46 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Read 36.6 Write 42 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 54.5 30% 41 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.5 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.5 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ConRoeXFire-eSATA2. Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: To ConRoeXFire-eSATA2.

CPU
Core2 6700Intel $230Bench 39%, 2,388 samples	2x
Core2 6400IntelBench 35%, 5,556 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
GeForce 8800 GTS-512NvidiaBench 7%, 1,256 samples	1x

RAM
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	2x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $230

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

To ConRoeXFire-eSATA2.

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: To ConRoeXFire-eSATA2.

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)