Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	20.8% Poor	Memory 25 1-Core 31.5 2-Core 56.3 22% 37.6 Pts	4-Core 93.4 8-Core 113 13% 103 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0100 2782) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.81% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 1 1% 0.97 fps	MRender 0.81 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 0.83 1% 0.91 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.81% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.2 4 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	2.84% Terrible	Read 10.7 Write 2.2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3.4 6% 5.12 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.84% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 1x4GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 4 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 286 14% 286 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16