HP HPE-350uk

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP HPE-350uk (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '20 at 13:16
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 169 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 361 37% 300 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.9% Poor	Lighting 36.2 Reflection 30.1 Parallax 36.5 30% 34.3 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 36.3 31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 114 127 129 135 134 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.2% Average	Read 224 Write 225 Mixed 214 SusWrite 118 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 20.5 79% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 180 140% 191 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 113%
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB 2,869 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 219GB free Firmware: DXM01D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 97 107 109 120 119 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.9% Below average	Read 228 Write 204 Mixed 212 SusWrite 103 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 16.4 4K Mixed 12.1 42% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 125 112% 169 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 107%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 218GB free Firmware: Z32070RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 109 121 122 77 70 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.8% Below average	Read 185 Write 212 Mixed 200 SusWrite 94.8 39% 173 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 10.3 51% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 28.3 60% 121 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 86%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 837GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 103 104 103 101 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 86.1 Write 73.7 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 99.1 57% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 59%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75 18,569 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 929GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 97 108 109 109 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 111 Write 111 Mixed 54 SusWrite 99.4 69% 94 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 2,501 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	41.5% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 13.5 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical HPE-350uk Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: HP HPE-350uk

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	1x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBAD80AD80Bench 38%, 28 samples	1x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 3x2GBCE80CE80Bench 31%, 151 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP HPE-350uk

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: HP HPE-350uk

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)