Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200701
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 29 '20 at 07:04
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Memory 75.2 1-Core 147 2-Core 285 91% 169 Pts	4-Core 534 8-Core 819 84% 677 Pts	64-Core 1,025 64% 1,025 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 874B) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Lighting 79.5 Reflection 72.3 Parallax 71.9 65% 74.6 fps	MRender 68.6 Gravity 73.1 Splatting 55.5 53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 62%
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8572) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.88% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 4.19 Parallax 4.41 4% 4.4 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.88% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 19,151 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 850 Write 851 Mixed 858 191% 853 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 51.5 199% 74.1 MB/s	DQ Read 821 DQ Write 596 DQ Mixed 608 481% 675 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 207%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 38GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 134 132 136 139 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 100 Write 96 Mixed 72 SusWrite 136 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 40GB free Firmware: CC98 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 100 99 108 110 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 107 Write 110 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 105 63% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 75%
Toshiba MQ01ABB200 2TB 1,626 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 170GB free Firmware: AY000U SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 93 95 95 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 91 Write 96.7 Mixed 33 SusWrite 93.8 57% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 61%
Generic- SD/MMC 126GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 78GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 7.4 19 13 17 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 19.8 Write 18.3 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 13.9 24% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 3.4 249% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 17%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 13 13 12 13 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	7.26% Terrible	Read 24 Write 9.5 Mixed 2 SusWrite 12.8 14% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.26% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 2x8GB 24,552 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.1% Good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 26.6 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 26.3 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 90 44% 90 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,642x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,410x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,467x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16