Asrock H110M-G/M.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H110M-G/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180301
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '20 at 23:09
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 83.7 2-Core 148 66% 107 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 218 33% 242 Pts	64-Core 119 7% 119 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Sapphire(174B E241) 2GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.6% Poor	Lighting 27.4 Reflection 26.7 Parallax 30.2 22% 28.1 fps	MRender 27.4 Gravity 30.4 Splatting 35.9 26% 31.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 244GB free (System drive) Firmware: 12.01B02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 16 20 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 62.7 Write 62.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 15.2 32% 42.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 58%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 755GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 52.7 Write 35 Mixed 43.7 33% 43.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 931GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 152 147 139 140 142 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 136 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 145 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 128% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB 7,184 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 20.5 Write 4.5 Mixed 7.8 11% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 97% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 12%
General USB Flash Disk 1GB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 800a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.1 2.8 2.9 3 2.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	2.05% Terrible	Read 8.8 Write 1.8 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 2.9 5% 4.25 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.05% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905625-030.A00G 2x8GB 2,560 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.6% Good	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 24.7 MC Mixed 23 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 17.4 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-G/M.2 Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-G/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	15x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	14x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	8x
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GBKingstonBench 76%, 38,955 samples	8x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	4x
M378A1G43EB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 417 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $191

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16