Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '20 at 19:12
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 82.7
1-Core 132
2-Core 256
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 792
83% 648 Pts
64-Core 899
60% 899 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Apple(106B 0210) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.03.05
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 142
Reflection 96.1
Parallax 236
37% 158 fps
MRender 76.6
Gravity 135
Splatting 112
36% 108 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 717.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1259 1199 1120 887 843 932 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 23.3
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 26
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback