Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	34% Below average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 14.8 2-Core 24.3 28% 34.4 Pts	4-Core 25.5 8-Core 32.5 4% 29 Pts	64-Core 18 1% 18 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9082) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.53% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.75 0% 0.76 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 1.04 1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.53% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 398GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 214 171 78 87 83 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.6% Below average	Read 249 Write 196 Mixed 206 SusWrite 148 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 18.9 4K Mixed 11.7 44% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 73 DQ Write 69.2 DQ Mixed 70.1 53% 70.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B1G73BH0-YK0 12GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1334, 1334 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	6.11% Terrible	MC Read 1.8 MC Write 1.1 MC Mixed 0.8 4% 1.23 GB/s	SC Read 1.2 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 2 4% 1.57 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 6.11% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	1x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CH9 RMT3010EC58E8F1333 4GBSamsungBench 36%, 8 samples	1x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16