Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 1,768 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Memory 74.8 1-Core 63.1 2-Core 91.9 50% 76.6 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 281 28% 225 Pts	64-Core 478 30% 478 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 66%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130 4,476 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 150 165 160 161 198 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 372 Write 275 Mixed 242 SusWrite 171 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 21.9 4K Mixed 22.9 75% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 149 128% 189 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170FH0-YH9 4x4GB 399 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	79.9% Very good	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 29.8 92% 32 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 9.2 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	495x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	304x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	183x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16