Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 50.3 1-Core 93.4 2-Core 187 59% 110 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 371 47% 358 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 809F) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.77% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 1.22 2% 2 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 1.74 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.77% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 120GB 2,648 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0817A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 64 32 47 38 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 499 Write 385 Mixed 374 SusWrite 72.4 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 0.5 40% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.2% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 25.3 73% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 10.5 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

SSD
SSDPR-CX400-512 512GBBench 75%, 4,680 samples	4x
SD8SN8U-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 70%, 12,432 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	7x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 92%, 30,689 samples	3x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	3x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $500

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16