Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory18.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateAug 26 '20 at 03:41
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 158
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 341
42% 322 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.2% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 111
Parallax 98.9
89% 106 fps
MRender 92
Gravity 119
Splatting 95.3
83% 102 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
651GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1072 1074 1176 1291 1338 1350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,078
Write 1283
Mixed 1,010
SusWrite 1,217
259% 1,147 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 46.7
150% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 502
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 414
313% 424 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 183%
Great: 311%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
50GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 99 89 86 78 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 377
Write 351
Mixed 286
SusWrite 122
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 25.5
94% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 291
225% 308 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
259GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 132 131 132 131 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 142
Write 145
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 132
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.1 3.3 2.9 3 3 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
8.23% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 4.3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 3
8% 7.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.4
143% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.23%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.C1GET.B710 78.C1GET.AU10 Dimm4_Manufacturer Dimm6_Manufacturer 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 37
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 32.5
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback