Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-4600M APU 5,886 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Memory 72.9 1-Core 54.2 2-Core 91.7 47% 72.9 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 143 19% 143 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 180F) 768MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	5.01% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 7.15 Parallax 6.09 5% 6.45 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 5.4 Splatting 7.57 5% 6.02 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.01% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 128 129 127 127 130 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 416 Write 364 Mixed 338 SusWrite 156 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 33.2 110% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 186 138% 183 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB 25,458 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.1% Below average	MC Read 16.7 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 11.9 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 9.7 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

RAM
M471B5173BH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,518 samples	4x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	2x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16