Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 73% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	48.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '20 at 01:01
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Memory 88.4 1-Core 117 2-Core 227 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 708 68% 560 Pts	64-Core 918 57% 918 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 3732) CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3538 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.3% Excellent	Lighting 87.7 Reflection 116 Parallax 104 72% 103 fps	MRender 162 Gravity 125 Splatting 103 103% 130 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 502 Write 477 Mixed 374 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 99.6 4K Mixed 56.4 189% 66.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 353 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 16TB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 460 461 463 466 466 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 446 Write 322 Mixed 115 SusWrite 460 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 1.3 13% 5.17 MB/s	DQ Read 22.1 DQ Write 15 DQ Mixed 9.2 9% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 257%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 15GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 106 109 109 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 108 Write 72.3 Mixed 79.8 SusWrite 108 68% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$143 14,506 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 44.1 MC Write 45 MC Mixed 44.1 127% 44.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 24.5 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	227x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	103x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	37x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $1,193

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16