Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 24 '20 at 12:34
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 156
2-Core 305
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 852
84% 689 Pts
64-Core 853
53% 853 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 189
Parallax 171
140% 178 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 172
Splatting 123
112% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 588 259 256 253 252 249 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,034
Write 1,264
Mixed 551
SusWrite 309
228% 1,040 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 64.3
242% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 1,138
DQ Mixed 1,074
834% 1,142 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 227%
Great: 236%
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB
34GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 278 277 285 208 267 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 411
Write 491
Mixed 376
SusWrite 275
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 44.9
169% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 283
205% 259 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 99%
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
96GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 195 196 197 197 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 424
Write 185
Mixed 224
SusWrite 192
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 16.8
118% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 29
45% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 70%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
357GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1924 1475 1183 1176 1171 1165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 1,956
Write 1,816
Mixed 748
SusWrite 1,349
328% 1,467 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 72.5
258% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,557
DQ Write 1,459
DQ Mixed 1,148
960% 1,388 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 307%
Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 203 202 203 204 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 114
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 201
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 113%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 24.2
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 24.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,001
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback