Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateAug 23 '20 at 20:21
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 69.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 1,106
97% 827 Pts
64-Core 2,066
128% 2,066 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
64.4% Good
Lighting 81.5
Reflection 88.1
Parallax 82.4
66% 84 fps
MRender 74.5
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 70.6
61% 74.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 407 417 427 421 393 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 412
Mixed 416
SusWrite 410
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 48.7
160% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 183
141% 193 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST4000VM000-1F3168 4TB
161GB free
Firmware: SC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 137 138 137 108 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 125
Write 121
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 127
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST4000VM000-1F3168 4TB
78GB free
Firmware: SC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 100 103 102 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 130
Write 130
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 101
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST4000VM000-1F3168 4TB
28GB free
Firmware: SC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 120 120 121 127 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 82.5
Write 83.3
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 123
61% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59%
Great: 102%
WD Se 4TB-$90
23GB free
Firmware: 01.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 95 93 98 98 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 84
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 93
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
199% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.1% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 27.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 25.4
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback