Medion C641

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Medion C641 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM2
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170222
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '20 at 12:20
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 111 2-Core 209 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 423 53% 405 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Elitegroup(1019 1041) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.1% Below average	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 29.1 Parallax 39.8 31% 35.5 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 36.1 Splatting 34 29% 36 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB 41,519 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30000P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 114 126 131 131 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 367 Write 117 Mixed 97.9 SusWrite 123 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 60 4K Mixed 17 66% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 118 117% 194 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 180 186 185 188 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 171 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 184 104% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB 22,600 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	45.2% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 12.3 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 13.8 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical C641 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: Medion C641

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	3x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	2x

RAM
CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 16GBUnknownBench 70%, 25 samples	4x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	1x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $169

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16