Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130 10,423 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 92.2 2-Core 177 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 407 48% 371 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400 12,355 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 414 414 414 414 413 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Read 390 Write 409 Mixed 300 SusWrite 414 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 25.3 78% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 337 252% 335 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 106%
Hitachi HTS723225L9A360 250GB-$100 587 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 178GB free Firmware: FCDOC60A SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 62 62 62 62 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 62.7 Write 62.2 Mixed 37.6 SusWrite 61.1 41% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 10,285 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15.6 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1,632x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	355x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	157x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	76x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	73x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	64x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16