Lenovo 2924V6M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2924V6M  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2924V6M
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121011
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 22 '20 at 20:26
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 132
54% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 169
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21C1) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.66
0% 0.75 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ8PA128HMCD-010L1 128GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM08L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 198 198 195 203 203 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 211
Write 205
Mixed 160
SusWrite 198
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 12
46% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 57.3
DQ Mixed 23.8
35% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
24.8% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.6
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback