Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 22 '20 at 19:34
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 216
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 617
61% 499 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 117
Parallax 121
104% 122 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 120
Splatting 96.2
102% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 214 230 189 182 179 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 363
Write 384
Mixed 341
SusWrite 206
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 39.8
138% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 266
222% 316 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 182%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 12TB
971GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 306 315 316 312 317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 298
Write 245
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 310
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 1.2
14% 4.87 MB/s
DQ Read 17.8
DQ Write 11.5
DQ Mixed 8.7
8% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 188%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
57GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 57 58 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 80
Write 58.3
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 56.3
47% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 96%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
163GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 64 63 65 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 103
Write 100
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 63.9
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
40GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 57 58 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 94.5
Write 99.7
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 56.3
62% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 67%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
229GB free
Firmware: 1AQ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 62 66 64 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 105
Write 114
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 64
63% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 72%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$81
488GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 139 141 141 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 135
Write 135
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 139
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
166GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 62 66 64 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 126
Write 116
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 64
73% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 76%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$231
78GB free
Firmware: 81.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 57 58 57 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 132
Write 139
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 56.4
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 1.4
362% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB
982GB free
Firmware: LEGN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 141 144 142 142 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 138
Write 143
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 141
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 1.7
339% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 136%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
50GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.4 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 103
Write 51.2
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 11.2
49% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.7
118% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22%
Great: 47%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
5GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 4.9 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
8.63% Terrible
Read 6.5
Write 6.3
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 4.6
8% 5.93 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.4
160% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.63%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 2,507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $612
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback