Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3455 3,455 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	28% Poor	Memory 30.6 1-Core 43.6 2-Core 87.8 30% 54 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 166 20% 154 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.01% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.34 2% 1.78 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 1.87 Splatting 4.78 3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.01% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hoodisk SSD 128GB 496 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 123 109 124 129 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 333 Write 196 Mixed 250 SusWrite 123 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 21.9 89% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 174 143% 204 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1.5GB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 4 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	28.6% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 10.1 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 251 16% 251 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J3455IntelBench 29%, 3,455 samples	3x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	2x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 128GBHoodiskBench 69%, 496 samples	3x

RAM
4x1.5GBUnknownBench 26%, 444 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16