Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150323
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 21 '20 at 16:59
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 132
59% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 372
38% 303 Pts
64-Core 428
29% 428 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$170
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.9% Average
Lighting 170
Reflection 111
Parallax 227
45% 169 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 177
Splatting 118
48% 139 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 62%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 246 191 156 200 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 388
Write 401
Mixed 292
SusWrite 204
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 27.2
90% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 169
122% 155 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 106%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$77
635GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 90 91 90 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 106
Write 68.7
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 88.9
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$77
489GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 102 101 100 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 118
Write 110
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 99.3
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$72
334GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 69 84 90 79 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 72.6
Write 66.6
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 78.2
53% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 67%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$89
813GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 143 146 147 140 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 163
Write 139
Mixed 95.6
SusWrite 140
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 87%
Great: 112%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
302GB free
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 79 80 84 83 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 55.7
Write 58.9
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 79.9
46% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 63%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
360GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 126 128 128 128 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 104
Write 79.2
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 126
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
322GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 135 136 139 141 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 110
Write 77.5
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 135
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 99%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
666GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 121 123 124 126 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 140
Write 104
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 121
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 99%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 83 83 85 86 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 98
Write 99.3
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 83
65% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 63%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
597GB free
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 82 85 85 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 113
Write 103
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 81.5
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 63%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
703GB free
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 83 82 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 103
Write 96.8
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 82.5
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA HDWQ140 4TB
542GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 136 135 138 136 135 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56% Above average
Read 124
Write 127
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 134
160% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
135% 1.77 MB/s
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
4TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 118 112 116 127 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 106
Write 143
Mixed 99.1
SusWrite 116
161% 116 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
207% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
978GB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 115 121 123 117 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 81.4
Write 99.6
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 115
131% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
173% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 16.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 13
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 2,132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $825
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $548SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback