PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Viglen VIG642M (all builds) |
Motherboard | Viglen Vig642M |
Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131030 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 21 '20 at 01:24 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
59.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 560ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 73 67 87 89 87 MB/s
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
449GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 89 91 90 90 MB/s
|
47.9%
Average
|
|||
Rsh-319 ASM1153E 1TB
77GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 21 20 20 20 MB/s
|
13.6%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
2GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 7.9 5.7 8.7 8.9 9.1 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
21.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 12x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 11x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 11x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 5x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $518 |