Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 89 1-Core 77.1 2-Core 131 62% 99.1 Pts	4-Core 177 8-Core 182 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 185 11% 185 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M 12,745 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sony(104D 90AB) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	4.48% Terrible	Lighting 5.73 Reflection 5.73 Parallax 4.5 5% 5.32 fps	MRender 5.19 Gravity 4.03 Splatting 5.57 4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.48% Great: 4%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK6459GSXP 640GB 2,156 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 386GB free (System drive) Firmware: GT102H Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,274 Write 5.5 Mixed 25.6 788% 1,102 MB/s	4K Read 370 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.6 15,493% 124 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 45%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 26GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 31.5 Write 8.2 Mixed 14.3 19% 18 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.2 143% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 9.4 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 10.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 7500MAMDBench 4%, 12,745 samples	8x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	1x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16