Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 838F
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190418
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '20 at 11:59
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 89.6 2-Core 184 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 362 48% 360 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 838F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	5.72% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 24 Parallax 6 5% 11.9 fps	MRender 9.48 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 12.3 8% 8.96 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.72% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	24% Poor	Lighting 30.8 Reflection 22.8 Parallax 27.3 25% 27 fps	MRender 32.4 Gravity 29.3 Splatting 20.9 22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Colorful CN600 256GB 355 User benchmarks, average bench 167% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0719B0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1518 Write 1,039 Mixed 856 251% 1,138 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 24 128% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 665 DQ Write 683 DQ Mixed 455 402% 601 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 250%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 734GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 116 118 119 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 116 Write 99.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 118 66% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB 71,691 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.1% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 21.6 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 18.8 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,350x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	785x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	778x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	293x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	273x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	158x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	308x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	191x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16