Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 53.5 1-Core 86.9 2-Core 171 57% 104 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 495 53% 424 Pts	64-Core 477 30% 477 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 087C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.8141 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.72% Terrible	Lighting 7.03 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 7.56 6% 8.71 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 3.47 Splatting 6.48 6% 7.14 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.72% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Pm981 NVMe Samsung 256GB 5,350 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD72D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 849 Write 1,089 Mixed 545 185% 828 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 83.8 4K Mixed 53.7 180% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 600 DQ Write 268 DQ Mixed 650 425% 506 MB/s
Poor: 110% Great: 255%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE 2x16GB 2,460 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	65.8% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 24.6 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 10.8 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,891x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 25%, 10,407 samples	1,590x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	57x

SSD
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc401Bench 146%, 10,182 samples	531x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	464x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	463x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 18,486 samples	772x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 2x16GBUnknownBench 79%, 7,078 samples	492x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 11,016 samples	387x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16