| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
| System | HP Z420 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1589 |
| Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131219 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 23 '17 at 11:06 |
| Run Duration | 84 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
83.1%
Excellent
|
76% 131 Pts
|
62% 495 Pts
|
37% 599 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 375.86
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
13% 16.6 fps
|
15% 19 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST240FP0 240GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B710 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
88%
Excellent
|
96% 434 MB/s
|
113% 41.4 MB/s
|
125% 234 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M391B5173QH0-CMA 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
110%
Outstanding
|
124% 43.6 GB/s
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
63% 63.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,656 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z420 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,496x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 772x |
| Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 685x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 494x |
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 304x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 260x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |