Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	88.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3350 x 2156 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160811
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '17 at 08:44
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2629 v3 2 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70.3% Very good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 88.5 2-Core 168 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 581 55% 455 Pts	64-Core 807 50% 807 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Lighting 22.9 Reflection 17.6 Parallax 20.6 19% 20.4 fps	MRender 25.6 Gravity 23.9 Splatting 17.6 18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q256G 256GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2180000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 4743 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 363 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 42 (A8) Unknown 100 100 94 (A9) Unknown 100 100 462 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 27 (AE) Unknown 100 100 338 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 53 227634446370 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 90 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 7368 (F1) Unknown 253 253 3910 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2715 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	59.6% Above average	Read 421 Write 368 Mixed 399 88% 396 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 13.2 63% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 21.7 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 10.9 16% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 99%
HGST Ultrastar He8 Helium 8TB-$94 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2.5TB free Firmware: A4GNT51F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 109 (03) Spinup time 175 175 25796608345 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 646 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11531 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 321 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 88 88 15314 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 15314 (C2) HDA temperature 133 133 223339151405 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	85% Excellent	Read 158 Write 139 Mixed 127 106% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.66 129% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 113%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41 7,860 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 122GB free Firmware: MK7OAA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 87 (03) Spinup time 186 186 4319674663 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1086 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 31 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 19096 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 762 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1628 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1628 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 240519086117 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	53.7% Above average	Read 86.9 Write 100 Mixed 59.4 61% 82.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.36 91% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 83%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$41 7,860 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 7GB free Firmware: MK7OAA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 88 (03) Spinup time 214 214 4317642990 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1070 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 31 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 19225 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 726 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1636 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1636 (C2) HDA temperature 136 136 236224118828 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 487	49.1% Average	Read 92.1 Write 78.6 Mixed 58.9 57% 76.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.33 91% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G3B1 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G3B1 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 96GB 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	109% Outstanding	MC Read 46.1 MC Write 42.6 MC Mixed 42.1 125% 43.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.8 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	466x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	109x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	85x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	75x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	46x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	42x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	21x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x4GBCorsair $97Bench 83%, 3,926 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	9x
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $982

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16