PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (all builds) |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100824 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 19 '20 at 01:07 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | UKR-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3690-$990
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
|
86.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Gigabyte(1458 3FF3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
133%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 123 122 122 121 MB/s
|
63.1%
Good
|
|||
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
111GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 123 123 122 124 MB/s
|
60%
Good
|
|||
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
150GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 105 106 106 106 MB/s
|
62.8%
Good
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
354GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 74 73 90 93 MB/s
|
48%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 627x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 405x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 217x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 148x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 104x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 102x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $397 |