Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core 4,397 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Memory 67.1 1-Core 143 2-Core 285 87% 165 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 927 87% 725 Pts	64-Core 1,607 99% 1,607 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 96%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Lighting 17.3 Reflection 12.6 Parallax 16.1 14% 15.3 fps	MRender 13.5 Gravity 16.9 Splatting 18.4 14% 16.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 15%
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Asus(1043 8709) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 128 Parallax 133 109% 132 fps	MRender 156 Gravity 115 Splatting 94.1 96% 122 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 496GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1217 1401 1397 1229 1345 1331 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	274% Outstanding	Read 2,259 Write 2,184 Mixed 1,714 SusWrite 1,320 420% 1,869 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 51.2 170% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1204 DQ Write 1,080 DQ Mixed 1,154 862% 1,146 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 274% Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 187 190 176 171 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 172 Mixed 66 SusWrite 178 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1.1 477% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$32 16,451 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 422GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 112 144 137 125 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 142 Write 164 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 133 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2666Z16K4 2x8GB 1,054 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	62.8% Good	MC Read 25 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 21.6 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.9 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 92%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 74%

Battleship

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	64x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	62x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	54x

SSD
PCS 2.5" SSD 256GB256gbBench 63%, 1,134 samples	32x
PCS PCIe M.2 SSD 512GB512gbBench 185%, 4,059 samples	32x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	29x

RAM
CM4X8GD3200C16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 89%, 9,947 samples	80x
CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 73%, 4,992 samples	41x
CM4X8GD3000C15K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 83%, 5,197 samples	40x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $406

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16