Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime4 Days
Run DateAug 17 '20 at 08:22
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 243
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 773
71% 596 Pts
64-Core 1,005
62% 1,005 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 177
Parallax 159
129% 165 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 162
Splatting 117
107% 132 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
104GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 443 432 428 416 425 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 410
Mixed 338
SusWrite 430
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 51.4
172% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 358
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Liteonit LCT-128M3S 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VQN6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 203 205 204 173 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 416
Write 203
Mixed 211
SusWrite 192
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 30.3
110% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 170
146% 216 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 82%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
510GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 442 431 428 415 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 408
Mixed 370
SusWrite 430
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 41.1
145% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 360 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 105%
Great: 121%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
16GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,721
Write 1,582
Mixed 665
293% 1,323 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 48.7
189% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,029
DQ Write 1,048
DQ Mixed 852
692% 976 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
1GB free
Firmware: CC41
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 71.5
Write 111
Mixed 26.2
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.9
345% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 180 185 183 176 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 159
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 180
108% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 102%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.6
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 18.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $979
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback