Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2100 APU 4,569 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Memory 40.8 1-Core 15.4 2-Core 27.9 20% 28 Pts	4-Core 30.8 8-Core 29.6 4% 30.2 Pts	64-Core 31.3 2% 31.3 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 26%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8210 4,832 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0834) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.14% Terrible	Lighting 1.13 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 1.19 1% 1.66 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 0.93 Splatting 2.35 2% 1.86 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.14% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH30 240GB 768 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 129 130 126 122 126 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 430 Write 328 Mixed 204 SusWrite 145 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 25.6 4K Mixed 11.2 50% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 80 DQ Mixed 32.1 42% 76.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Smart SH5641G8FJ8NWRNSQG 1x8GB 3,351 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 4.7 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 5.3 12% 4.2 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 20%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-2100 APUAMDBench 17%, 4,569 samples	6x

GPU
HD 8210AMDBench 1%, 4,832 samples	6x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	1x
ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 2,133 samples	1x
M471B5273EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 29%, 749 samples	1x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $35

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16