Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9230 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 148 User benchmarks, average bench 32% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Memory 61.7 1-Core 50.2 2-Core 82.1 41% 64.7 Pts	4-Core 81.8 8-Core 78.1 11% 79.9 Pts	64-Core 76.4 5% 76.4 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 364F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	2.79% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 5.65 Parallax 4.38 3% 4.44 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 4 3% 3.58 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.79% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 323 Write 326 Mixed 134 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 12.6 58% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 85.1 DQ Mixed 33.1 50% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 86%
Seagate Desktop 1TB 4,684 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 929GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 26 25 25 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 27 Write 22.3 Mixed 13.8 SusWrite 25.1 29% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905678-139.A00G Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2133, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.3% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 6.9 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 7.1 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 123 33% 123 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
A6-9230 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 32%, 148 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	1x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16