| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| Motherboard | To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080701 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 15 '20 at 15:42 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.1%
Average
|
46% 71.5 Pts
|
12% 91.4 Pts
|
6% 93.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.1.3
|
19.6%
Very poor
|
18% 26.8 fps
|
22% 26.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 58 64 70 73 74 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
46% 61.8 MB/s
|
149% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
113GB free
Firmware: VT100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 61 62 62 MB/s
|
33.6%
Below average
|
41% 55.1 MB/s
|
140% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
100GB free
Firmware: VT100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 41 41 42 41 MB/s
|
30.4%
Below average
|
40% 54 MB/s
|
134% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
|
20.8%
Poor
|
18% 6.43 GB/s
|
17% 5.93 GB/s
|
46% 86.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,554 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 704x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 278x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 263x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 613x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 461x |
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 361x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |