Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '20 at 15:33
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 815
79% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,238
77% 1,238 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 114
Parallax 110
88% 111 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 98.5
Splatting 82.2
74% 91.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 842 417 420 421 422 421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,532
Write 1,610
Mixed 1,248
SusWrite 490
274% 1,220 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 46.5
155% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 356
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 155%
Great: 237%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
32GB free
Firmware: UF5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 130 150 135 79 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 428
Write 340
Mixed 204
SusWrite 131
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 14
65% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 88.3
DQ Mixed 35.9
45% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 56%
Toshiba DT01ABA100V 1TB
209GB free
Firmware: MU2OA720
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 87 86 87 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 87
Write 89.2
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 86.6
51% 70.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
253GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 52 50 52 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 75.5
Write 76.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 51.2
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 57%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
135GB free
Firmware: JA0OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 55 55 56 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 93.2
Write 83.7
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 54.6
49% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 57%
Mass Storage Device 8GB
7GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.7 4.2 4.4 6 6.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 9.2
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 5.4
12% 9.75 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
95% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 32.9
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 26.4
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 95%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback