Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549 3,981 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 116 2-Core 226 80% 142 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 539 57% 457 Pts	64-Core 544 34% 544 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M 4,288 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 21F6) 2GB CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 600 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 426.32 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.47% Terrible	Lighting 8.43 Reflection 7.77 Parallax 9.5 7% 8.57 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 10.1 Splatting 11 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.47% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MT-128 128GB 290 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: H181 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 242 236 241 241 235 MB/s Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.1% Good	Read 253 Write 238 Mixed 240 SusWrite 236 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 29.3 110% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 165 127% 173 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 91%
Ct250mx5 0 250GB 930 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 209GB free Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 219 207 210 220 211 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 484 Write 237 Mixed 238 SusWrite 211 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 30.3 104% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 178 147% 210 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 117%
Toshiba HDWL120 2TB 1,726 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: JT00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 141 139 142 141 141 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 144 Write 108 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 140 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.6 234% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 2,824 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 18.9 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 18.8 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	5x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	4x

GPU
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	5x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	4x

SSD
Burst Elite 240GBPatriotBench 68%, 2,182 samples	2x
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	2x
IR-SSDPR-S25A-240 240GBBench 81%, 1,611 samples	2x

RAM
EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8C-PB 16GBElpidaBench 37%, 4 samples	2x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B2873FHS-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 9GBSamsungBench 42%, 2 samples	2x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 8GBElpidaBench 30%, 2 samples	2x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16