| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B85M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151211 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 14 '20 at 23:58 |
| Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 31% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
64.6%
Good
|
63% 103 Pts
|
39% 323 Pts
|
28% 444 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
75.7%
Very good
|
79% 98.6 fps
|
69% 84.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 28 27 26 26 26 MB/s
|
||||
|
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
309GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 219 230 165 167 162 MB/s
|
47.8%
Average
|
63% 281 MB/s
|
64% 20.6 MB/s
|
64% 85.4 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
554GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 137 137 137 138 MB/s
|
87.9%
Excellent
|
99% 136 MB/s
|
135% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
49.8%
Average
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
36% 12.7 GB/s
|
55% 72.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B85M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,251 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro4 - $150
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 189x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 139x |
| Core i5-4690Intel $52Bench 67%, 73,695 samples | 133x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 114x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 83x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $387 |