| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus G11CD-K (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK G11CD-K |
| Memory | 1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161125 |
| Uptime | 11.3 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 14 '20 at 22:40 |
| Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 48% |
PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
46.2%
Average
|
51% 87.6 Pts
|
24% 183 Pts
|
8% 134 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 86DC) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.4%
Very poor
|
19% 22.6 fps
|
16% 20.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
69GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 308 319 357 350 291 MB/s
|
80.7%
Excellent
|
81% 358 MB/s
|
102% 32.5 MB/s
|
238% 319 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
644GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 91 93 80 72 34 MB/s
|
24.8%
Poor
|
35% 47.8 MB/s
|
45% 0.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
28.6%
Poor
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
18% 6.4 GB/s
|
33% 122 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,733 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus G11CD-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 912x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 725x |
| Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 30x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 454x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 296x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 235x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $196 |