MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PLUS (all builds)
Memory	24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191111
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '20 at 17:34
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 74 1-Core 124 2-Core 230 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 676 66% 541 Pts	64-Core 1,048 65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% MSI(1462 C75C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 118 Reflection 116 Parallax 128 96% 121 fps	Gravity 116 Splatting 97 93% 107 fps
Poor: 93% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95 12,034 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 404GB free (System drive) Firmware: LHF002C SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 399 418 425 428 427 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 488 Write 444 Mixed 431 SusWrite 412 100% 444 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 47.3 149% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 214 182% 265 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 464GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 432 455 470 473 473 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 473 Mixed 448 SusWrite 450 105% 465 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 91.4 4K Mixed 50.9 171% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 364 DQ Mixed 373 281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40 16,752 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 151GB free Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 82 115 115 77 115 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 385 Write 315 Mixed 320 SusWrite 118 64% 285 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 20 104% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 25.5 72% 150 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 506GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 72 71 73 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 75.6 Write 71.8 Mixed 54.2 SusWrite 72.1 50% 68.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 67%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB 3,818 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 22GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 7.5 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	7.94% Terrible	Read 23.3 Write 16.4 Mixed 13.9 SusWrite 7.9 19% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 67% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.94% Great: 35%
623 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 16GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 13 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Read 38 Write 31.1 Mixed 17.6 SusWrite 12.8 31% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 29% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 49%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB 3,818 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 58GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 10 8 8.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 33 Write 20.1 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 11 22% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.1 76% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 35%
Verbatim STORE N GO 64GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 48GB free, PID 0258 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 8.5 8.6 9.1 9.5 9.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 36.3 Write 15.5 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 9.1 22% 19 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.9 75% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 32GB 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 26.9 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 20 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 23.5 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 92.4 43% 92.4 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,175x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	748x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	643x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	323x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	282x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	225x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	207x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	147x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	134x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	357x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	204x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	167x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $702

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16