Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '20 at 17:20
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 73.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 202
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 594
55% 461 Pts
64-Core 752
47% 752 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.17
Reflection 3.88
Parallax 3.97
3% 4.01 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 3.63
Splatting 5.83
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$60
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8TM53.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 108 105 103 106 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 216
Write 558
Mixed 124
SusWrite 126
58% 256 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 21
66% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 379
317% 447 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 153%
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30
45GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 65 66 112 64 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 446
Write 315
Mixed 329
SusWrite 118
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 27.9
115% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 169
154% 229 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 149 154 152 152 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 72.2
Write 140
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 141
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AR32C16S8K2SU416R 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 26.1
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 19.6
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback