HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '20 at 08:10
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 200
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 283
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 18E4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.47
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 4.41
3% 4.37 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.57
4% 4.84 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
249GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 145 145 145 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 105
Write 80
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 144
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 122 131 137 143 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 113
Write 150
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 132
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
758GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 145 146 146 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 123
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 145
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
994GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 156 156 155 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 158
Write 107
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 155
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 113%
Toshiba MG03ACA3 2TB
3TB free
Firmware: NS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 122 122 124 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.7% Good
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 123
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 87%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.5 4.2 4.6 4 4.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Read 15.9
Write 3.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 4.2
6% 6.25 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.7% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback