Samsung 750QUA

Performance Results

Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop 59%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 750QUA  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP750QUA-K01US
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180903
Uptime2 Days
Run DateAug 13 '20 at 23:43
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 158
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 494
48% 382 Pts
64-Core 476
32% 476 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Sanyo(144D C168) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
8.95% Terrible
Lighting 9.93
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 16.3
8% 12.8 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 17
10% 13.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 12%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT22K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 140 151 145 147 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 418
Write 166
Mixed 172
SusWrite 146
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 19.8
83% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 120
109% 168 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 21.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 19.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 750QUA Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 57%
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 750QUA

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback