Asus CG8270

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	85.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus CG8270 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG8270
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '20 at 19:16
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 100 2-Core 197 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 510 50% 412 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 868E) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.9% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 79.6 Parallax 94.5 89% 94.5 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 97 Splatting 76.7 80% 101 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 84 88 87 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 125 Write 114 Mixed 132 SusWrite 85.5 26% 114 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 25.8 105% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 31.8 35% 55.8 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 61%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 179GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 182 203 201 201 195 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59% Above average	Read 223 Write 210 Mixed 204 SusWrite 191 47% 207 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 34.8 114% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 39.2 DQ Write 83.3 DQ Mixed 50.9 42% 57.8 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 43,127 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.6% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 9.6 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 10.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG8270 Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus CG8270

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	227x
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	18x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	29x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	11x

RAM
SLA302G08-GGNHC 2x4GBUnknownBench 54%, 1,334 samples	13x
SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 881 samples	12x
EL64C1C1624Z1 2x4GBAdataBench 55%, 601 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $567

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16