Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	80.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190524
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '20 at 03:28
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 92.9 1-Core 148 2-Core 280 96% 173 Pts	4-Core 574 8-Core 1146 101% 860 Pts	64-Core 1,118 69% 1,118 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 94.3 Parallax 86.4 84% 94.5 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 90.9 Splatting 81.4 75% 93.1 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 7TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 139 147 147 145 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 101 Write 123 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 144 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.5 197% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 90%
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB 15,164 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 107 79 81 116 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	155% Outstanding	Read 426 Write 340 Mixed 243 SusWrite 111 207% 280 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.9 762% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 160%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 741GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 186 183 186 185 186 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 146 Mixed 82.3 SusWrite 185 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 113%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 13,353 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 3TB free Firmware: 0109 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 131 129 130 133 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 104 Write 119 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 130 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.7 174% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 65%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 2,737 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 6GB free, PID 007a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 7.4 7.8 7 7.6 7.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	5.87% Terrible	Read 19.6 Write 4.8 Mixed 7 SusWrite 7.2 11% 9.65 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.87% Great: 7%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 1GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 0716 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.7 3.7 3.4 3.6 3.8 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	2.65% Terrible	Read 6.5 Write 2.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 3.5 4% 3.75 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.65% Great: 6%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 16GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 0.5 2.2 4.9 4.3 4.3 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 8 Mixed 5.7 SusWrite 3.2 11% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 3.3 194% 3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 26GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.2 3.3 5.4 8.3 7.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	6.17% Terrible	Read 18.9 Write 1 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 5.2 10% 8.95 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 53% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.17% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer 78.C1GS7.AUW0B 2x8GB 551 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	MC Read 34.3 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 24.2 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 26.5 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,616x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,217x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	177x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	832x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	481x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	429x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	297x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	218x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	142x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	361x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	171x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	162x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $438

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16